Act on Establishment of Administrative Courts and Administrative Court Procedure B.E. 2542 (1999)
Defines administrative cases, the courts’ jurisdiction and filing deadlines that are generally shorter than in civil cases.
Practice area
Challenging unfair administrative decisions through the correct procedure and deadlines.

When a state agency issues a decision affecting your rights — refusing renewal, revoking a permit, imposing an administrative fine or rejecting an application — you may appeal internally and file with the Administrative Court within strict deadlines. We assess the legality of the decision, prepare the appeal, the complaint and any stay application, and act through to the Supreme Administrative Court.
Internal appeals follow the timeframe in the governing statute; Administrative Court cases typically run longer than ordinary civil litigation because the court conducts its own fact-finding.
Timeframes are indicative only and depend on the authority, the court calendar and the completeness of your documents.

A lawful administrative order must come from an authorised officer, follow the prescribed procedure and carry adequate reasons. An effective challenge therefore does not simply disagree; it identifies which of those three elements failed — for example, no opportunity to be heard before issuance, or no statement of the reasons and legal basis relied on.
The date of notification is the element most often overlooked, because appeal periods run from it. We ask clients to keep the envelope, delivery receipt or electronic record — these small documents decide whether the case is heard at all or dismissed as out of time.
Summarised for general understanding only. The application of each provision depends on the facts of your case.
Defines administrative cases, the courts’ jurisdiction and filing deadlines that are generally shorter than in civil cases.
Administrative orders must state reasons and inform the right of appeal; failure to do so can extend the appeal period.
Used to obtain the agency file so the reasoning behind an order can be examined before challenging it.
Sets out state and official liability and the route to claim compensation.
These are constructed examples used to explain procedure. They are not client matters, and no outcome is implied or guaranteed.
Situation: A business receives a revocation notice without having been given a chance to respond.
Usual approach: First examine procedural legality — right to be heard, stated reasons, and the issuer’s authority — then consider the internal appeal plus a stay request alongside the court filing. (Hypothetical.)
Situation: A bidder is disqualified on technical grounds it believes are wrong.
Usual approach: Request the evaluation records and object through the procurement rules immediately — the deadlines are short and affect later court rights.
Province pages set out the courts and authorities with jurisdiction locally, and answer the questions people in that area ask.
Check the notification for the stated appeal right and deadline, file the internal appeal in time, and if the result is still unfair, proceed to the Administrative Court.
Yes, where they are affected by a Thai state decision. Proceedings are in Thai and foreign documents need certified translations.
Many administrative cases are fee-free, except claims for money or delivery of property, which are charged on the amount claimed.
You may request a stay; the court weighs the harm to the claimant against the public interest.
Tell us the facts and we will explain the options, the documents required and the realistic timeframe before you decide.