Computer-Related Crime Act B.E. 2550 (2007), as amended
Covers unauthorised access, data interference and entering false data into a computer system.
Practice area
Acting quickly when money is transferred by deception or rights are violated online.

Online fraud cases turn on speed, because funds are usually dispersed within hours. We handle digital evidence preservation in court-admissible form, criminal complaints, coordination of account freezing through lawful channels, civil recovery claims, and action against defamatory or unlawfully published content.
A complaint can be lodged within days once evidence is ready, but investigation, financial-institution requests and litigation to judgment depend on how complex the money trail is.
Timeframes are indicative only and depend on the authority, the court calendar and the completeness of your documents.

Funds in online fraud are layered through multiple accounts quickly. The more time passes, the more accounts must be traced and the less remains in each. The correct order is: notify the financial institution first, preserve evidence systematically, and file the complaint without waiting for a perfect file — supplementary documents can be added later.
A common mistake is continuing to contact the fraudster to ask for a refund. It rarely works and gives them time to delete accounts, close channels or reframe the matter as an ordinary civil dispute. Our advice is to stop contact, preserve everything, and let the legal process run.
Summarised for general understanding only. The application of each provision depends on the facts of your case.
Covers unauthorised access, data interference and entering false data into a computer system.
Enables rapid suspension of suspect accounts through financial institutions and state channels.
Fraud, misappropriation and defamation are the principal offences in online-scam cases.
Applies where personal data is unlawfully disclosed and grounds a complaint to the regulator.
These are constructed examples used to explain procedure. They are not client matters, and no outcome is implied or guaranteed.
Situation: The buyer transfers payment; the seller then closes the social account and stops replying.
Usual approach: The first 24–48 hours matter most: notify the sending bank, file the online police report, and preserve slips, chats and account details before pursuing criminal and civil recovery together. (Hypothetical.)
Situation: False accusations are posted in a public group and widely shared.
Usual approach: Capture evidence showing URLs and timestamps before requesting takedown — deleting first makes proof difficult — then consider a cease-and-desist and the appropriate legal route.
Province pages set out the courts and authorities with jurisdiction locally, and answer the questions people in that area ask.
Notify the bank immediately to request a hold, preserve every piece of evidence, and file a police complaint as fast as possible — speed directly affects recovery prospects.
Thai proceedings are possible where the loss occurred in Thailand; pursuing the person or assets abroad requires international cooperation and takes longer.
Yes, but they should capture full context — account name, date, time and how it was accessed. Systematic preservation carries more weight in court.
Criminal proceedings punish the offender; civil claims recover the money. The two are often run in parallel to improve the chance of compensation.
Tell us the facts and we will explain the options, the documents required and the realistic timeframe before you decide.