Civil and Commercial Code
Contract-for-work and agency provisions frame the scope of a monthly retainer.
Practice area
A standing legal team that knows your business, without hiring in-house staff.

Many businesses need fast, continuing legal answers but are not ready for an in-house department. Our monthly retainer covers day-to-day queries, review of recurring contracts, employment and data-protection compliance checks, statutory deadline reminders, and coordination with our litigation, documentation and certified-translation teams when a matter escalates.
Service can start within a few working days of agreeing scope; the initial contract review typically takes one to two weeks depending on volume.
Timeframes are indicative only and depend on the authority, the court calendar and the completeness of your documents.

Most disputes begin in a handful of lines: payment terms with no due date, vague termination clauses, or employment contracts inconsistent with the work rules. Having counsel review these routinely removes risk at source instead of letting it become litigation that runs for years.
The advantage of a retainer is cumulative context: answers get faster and more specific over time, unlike one-off instructions where the background must be re-explained each time. When a matter needs notarisation, certified translation or litigation, it all sits in the same office rather than starting over elsewhere.
Summarised for general understanding only. The application of each provision depends on the facts of your case.
Contract-for-work and agency provisions frame the scope of a monthly retainer.
Governs lawyers’ status and ethics, including the duty of client confidentiality.
These are constructed examples used to explain procedure. They are not client matters, and no outcome is implied or guaranteed.
Situation: A company reuses one template with every customer and the same dispute keeps recurring.
Usual approach: Review the whole template set once, fix the root clauses and give the sales team a playbook — usually cheaper than litigating case by case. (Hypothetical.)
Province pages set out the courts and authorities with jurisdiction locally, and answer the questions people in that area ask.
Yes, where legal questions recur — customer contracts, employment or data protection. Scope can be sized down to match actual use.
We agree a primary channel such as email or a team chat, with defined response times so the working relationship is predictable.
Yes. It is commonly used for visas, work permits, leases and personal documents needed both in Thailand and abroad.
We assess the case and propose a separate litigation scope; the team already advising you hands the file to our litigation team in the same office.
Tell us the facts and we will explain the options, the documents required and the realistic timeframe before you decide.